C—01
Claim dossier
Atomic statements with the original wording preserved.
01 / 06
Don't trust
the answer.
Trace the evidence.
An answer can sound right. Let's find out if it is.
Follow every claim from first question to final verdict.
AN AI ANSWER, UNDER EXAMINATION
“Apollo 11 landed in 1969.
Buzz Aldrin stepped out first.”
Comparing independent evidence03 / 04
Answer→Claims→Evidence→Verdict
Animated demonstration · not a live fact-check
A confident answer is only the beginning.
Scroll to open the response and follow what survives.
HG / CASE 00101 — 04
ORIGINAL RESPONSE
“Apollo 11 landed in 1969. Buzz Aldrin was the first person to step onto the lunar surface.”
CLAIM EXTRACTION
C—01Apollo 11 landed in 1969.
C—02Buzz Aldrin stepped out first.
PRIMARY RECORD / NASA
Neil Armstrong was the first person to step onto the Moon, followed by Buzz Aldrin.
DIRECT CONTRADICTION · PRIMARY SOURCEVERDICT ISSUED
CORRECTED
Apollo 11 landed in 1969. Neil Armstrong was the first person to step onto the lunar surface.
Answer
Start with the exact response.
The system preserves the original language before analysis begins.
Five specialists. One continuous evidence trail.
Each scroll step hands the same claim to a new kind of intelligence.
Detector
Breaks the answer into independently checkable claims while preserving the original context.
OUTPUTAtomic claim dossier
ANY EVIDENCE SHAPE
Research
Evidence that moves with the claim. Every output stays readable: what was claimed, which passage was found, and what the evidence establishes.
E—04
Evidence map
Passages connected directly to the claims they address.
02 / 06
R—02
Contradiction brief
Disagreement isolated without discarding valid context.
03 / 06
S—11
Source lineage
A visible trail from primary record to final verdict.
04 / 06
U—03
Uncertainty note
What remains unresolved is stated with precision.
05 / 06
V—05
Correction record
The repair, the reason, and the re-verification together.
06 / 06
S—11
Source lineage
A visible trail from primary record to final verdict.
01 / 06
U—03
Uncertainty note
What remains unresolved is stated with precision.
02 / 06
V—05
Correction record
The repair, the reason, and the re-verification together.
03 / 06
C—01
Claim dossier
Atomic statements with the original wording preserved.
04 / 06
E—04
Evidence map
Passages connected directly to the claims they address.
05 / 06
R—02
Contradiction brief
Disagreement isolated without discarding valid context.
06 / 06
LIVE EVIDENCE DESKCLAIM → SOURCE → VERDICT
Everything the agents can do.
Twelve coordinated capabilities, continuously moving through one evidence system.
Atomic claim extraction
One answer becomes precise, testable statements.
Primary-source retrieval
Evidence is found at passage level, not page level.
Claim-source matching
Each citation is attached to the statement it addresses.
Contradiction detection
Disagreement stays visible instead of being averaged away.
Context preservation
Qualifiers survive every handoff between agents.
Evidence grading
Authority, recency, and directness are weighed independently.
Multi-agent routing
The right specialist receives the claim at the right moment.
Human escalation
Ambiguous cases can stop and ask for judgment.
Correction loop
A repaired answer is verified again before release.
Provenance trail
Every decision keeps a readable chain of custody.
Source quality checks
Primary records are distinguished from summaries.
Auditable verdicts
The conclusion arrives with its reasoning attached.
A citation is a link. The relationship is the proof.
HalluciGuard does not count links. It asks what each passage actually establishes, then keeps disagreement visible.
SupportContradictionContext only
Apollo 11 landed in July 1969.
Neil Armstrong stepped onto the surface first.
Buzz Aldrin followed Armstrong onto the Moon.
CLAIM C—02
“Buzz Aldrin stepped out first.”
VERDICTContradicted
Correct the person. Preserve the mission and date.
THE VERIFICATION DIFFERENCE
An answer is only the beginning.
See what happens when every claim is given a chance to prove itself.
With HalluciGuard
Claims are separated, verified, and traced to evidence.
Without verification
Confident statements can pass through without being checked.
Help and support
Answers to common questions about verification, verdicts, and how everything works.
Still got questions?
Contact usGet in touch
Reach out to our team at any time for support or questions and we'll get back to you within 2 business days.